W.P.(C) No. 162/2023
VISHAL TIWARI VS UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court held that the power of courts to interfere with the regulatory functions of SEBI is limited. The Court did not find any valid grounds to cancel the amendments made to SEBI Regulations. The Court held that there was no apparent failure in regulation by SEBI and hence there was no need to transfer the investigation to an SIT. The Court directed the Union Government and SEBI to consider the suggestions made by the expert committee to strengthen the regulatory framework. The judgment of the court was authored by Chief Justice Chandrachud.
View Full Judgment
November 6 1995
Civil Appeal/3405/1995
Hon'ble Justice K. RAMASWAMY, B.N. KIRPAL
S. PRABHA SINGH DHILLON ETC. ETC. Vs. HOSHIARPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST AND ORS.
November 6 1995
Civil Appeal/3405/1995
Honourable Judge K. RAMASWAMY, B.N. KIRPAL
S. PRABHA SINGH DHILLON ETC. ETC. Vs. HOSHIARPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST AND ORS.
February 12 2021
SA/28/2021
Hon'ble Justice B KRISHNA MOHAN
Barigala Kotesh Vs. Bandaru Yedukondalu,
February 12 2021
SA/28/2021
Honourable Judge B KRISHNA MOHAN
Barigala Kotesh Vs. Bandaru Yedukondalu,
The First Chief Justice of Andhra High Court , Guntur.
The first Chief Justice of High Court of Andhra Pradesh , Hydrabad.
The First Chief Justice of India elevated from Andhra Pradesh.
The Hon'ble Sri Justice Koka Subba Rao, B.A., B.L., Judge, Supreme Court, since January 31, 1958. Born on July 15, 1902; educated at Govt. Arts College, Rajahmundry and Law College, Madras. Practised in Madras High Court from 1926. Judge, Madras High Court (March 1948 - July 1954). Chief Justice, Andhra High Court, Guntur (July 5, 1954 - October 31, 1956); Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh High Court (November 1, 1956 - January 1958). Appointed as Chief Justice of India on 30.06.1966.
Resigned from his office on April 11, 1967, . The reason for his resignation was to contest the Presidential Elections as the candidate of the united opposition parties. He ultimately lost the election to Dr. Zakir Hussain.
This event marked him as the first Supreme Court Judge to resign to pursue a career in politics. While his decision garnered attention for its novelty, it also attracted public disapproval.