High Court Logo

Judgments Circulated

Show entries
Search:
Sl.No. Case Number/Citation Date of Judgment Names of Parties Hon'ble Bench Directions in brief Judgment
1 SLP (Criminal) No.1613/2026 23-03-2026 Sunny Chauhan Vs State Of Haryana The Chief Justice Of India, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, Justice Vipul M. Pancholi
Instructions to Honble High Courts for speedy disposal of Bail, Anticipatory bail and suspension of sentence petitions - request the Hon’ble Chief Justices to revisit the roster/listing arrangements
Read More
2 Civil Appeal No.40/2026 05-01-2026 Nirbhay Singh Suliya Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. Justice K.v. Viswanathan
Service Law / Administrative Law – Challenge to State action – Scope of judicial review over administrative decisions and principles of natural justice in grant/denial of relief. - A judicial officer cannot be disciplined for an erroneous or inconsistent judicial orders unless there is clear evidence of mala fide, corruption, or extraneous influence.
Read More
3 SLP (Criminal) No.10010/2025 05-08-2025 Kallu Nat Alias Mayank Kumar Nagar Vs State Of U.p. And Anr. Justice J.b. Pardiwala
Principles governing cognizance of offences, committal of cases, and power to summon additional accused under the Code of Criminal Procedure
Read More
4 Civil Appeal No.7110/2025 23-05-2025 Bank Of India Vs M/s Sri Nangli Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Justice J.b. Pardiwala
Summary of legal principles governing Sec. 11 of the SARFAESI Act and its applicability to Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Read More
5 Civil Appeal No.7707/2025 14-07-2025 Estate Officer, Haryan Urban Development Authority & Ors. Vs Nirmala Devi Justice J.b. Pardiwala & Justice R. Mahadevan
Guidelines on “Land Acquisition, compensation, and limits ofRehabilitation Schemes by the State
Read More
6 Criminal Appeal No.3528/2025 14-08-2025 State Of Karnataka Vs Sri Darshan Etc. Justice R. Mahadevan
No one is above the law: principles governing bail, equality before law, and accountability of Influential accused -influence of accused, and protection of fair trial.
Read More
7 SLP (Civil) No.6092/2025 14-08-2025 M/s Armour Security (india) Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Cgst, Delhi East & Anr. Justice J.b. Pardiwala
Guidelines to prevent overlapping Tax investigations and ensure coordination between Central and State Authorities under the GST Regime.
Read More
8 Civil Appeal No.14761/2025 15-12-2025 Danesh Singh & Ors. Vs Har Pyari (dead) Thr. Lrs. Justice J.b. Pardiwala
Doctrine of Lis- pendens, execution of decrees, and remedies of parties under Rules 58–104, Order XXI CPC and Section 47 CPC.
Read More
9 Civil Appeal No.6856/2025 15-05-2025 M/s. Gayatri Project Limited Vs Madhya Pradesh Road Development Justice J.b.pardiwala And Justice R.mahadevan
Where the arbitration proceedings are still underway, but statement of defence has been filed, there it would not be open for the parties to raise an objection of lack of jurisdiction, but if the statement of defence has already been filed, the relevant stage for raising an issue of jurisdictions is already crossed and it would not be open for the parties to raise an objection of lack of jurisdiction.
Read More
10 Criminal Appeal No.3830/2025 02-09-2025 Phireram Vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. Justice J.b. Pardiwala
Principles governing Cancellation of Bail
Read More
11 Transfer Petition (Criminal) No.1100/2025 28-11-2025 Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. & Ors. Vs M/s Heg Ltd. Justice J.b. Pardiwala
Jurisdiction and transfer of Cheque dishonour cases: continuation of proceedings post evidence stage under Section 138 NI Act - principles governing territorial jurisdiction and transfer of proceedings under Sections 138, 142(2) & 142A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Transfer of pending complaint cases after commencement of evidence: Clarification of Law on Jurisdiction - “Jurisdiction of Payee’s Bank and Continuity of trial in Section 138 proceedings: Supreme Court guidelines - “Doctrine of Continuity in trial proceedings despite jurisdictional defect in Cheque bounce cases - once evidence begins, trial must continue: Supreme court on Jurisdiction and transfer in Section 138 NI Act Case.
Read More
12 SLP (Criminal) No.71965/2025 08-01-2026 Vijay Kumar & Ors. Vs State Of Rajasthan Justice J.b. Pardiwala & Justice K.v. Viswanathan
Directions to High Court for expeditious disposal of the petitions wherein intermorders are passed holding up the trial more particularly in sensitive and serious matters like murder, dowry death and rape etc
Read More
13 Civil Appeal No.10048/2025 05-08-2025 Operation Asha Vs Shelly Batra & Ors. Justice J.b. Pardiwala
Comprehensive principles on maintainability of suits under Sec. 92 CPC, Public and Constructive trusts, and scope of judicial intervention.
Read More
14 Civil Appeal No.14630/2025 08-12-2025 Harshbir Singh Pannu & Anr. Vs Jaswinder Singh Justice J.b. Pardiwala
Termination and recall of Arbitral proceedings, payment of fees, and appointment of Substitute Arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - remedies for non-deposit of Arbitral fees and resumption of Arbitration through Substitute Arbitrator.
Read More
15 Criminal Appeal No.3219/2025 28-07-2025 Gajanan Dattatray Gore Vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr. Justice J.b. Pardiwala
Directions prohibiting grant of Bail based on monetary undertakings and emphasizing merit-based consideration
Read More
16 Criminal Appeal No.3343/2025 05-08-2025 Narayan Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh Justice J.b. Pardiwala
Legal analysis of Sec.304 IPC, applicability of exceptions to Section 300 IPC, and grounds for acquittal.
Read More
17 SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION (C) No.7/2024 22-04-2025 Na Vs Na Abhay S. Oka, J
The Central Project Co-ordinator of e-court project or Registrar (Computer/IT) of the High Courts, as the case may be, with the help of the State Government, shall create a dashboard on which the information regarding the amounts lying deposited in connection with the compensation granted under 1988 or 1923 Acts shall be regularly uploaded with all details. It will help all concerned to implement the directions issued under this order.
Read More
18 Civil Appeal No.6174/2023 19-02-2026 Bhopal Municipal Corporation Vs Dr. Subhash C. Pandey & Ors. Justice Pankaj Mithal & Justice S V N Bhatti
Solid Waste Management Rules - requested all he Chief Justices of the High Courts and the Learned airpersons of the Tribunals to ensure compliance with SWM Rules, 2024, by all the courts and tribunals within their jurisdictions with effect from 01.04.2026.
Read More
19 Writ Petition (Civil) No.1000/2022 30-01-2026 Dr. Jaya Thakur Vs Government Of India & Ors. Justice J.b. Pardiwala & Justice R. Mahadevan
Directions to the Union of India, the States and Union Territories respectively to ensure providing of (i) free sanitary pads to every female child studying between classes 6 & 12; and (ii) a separate toilet for females in all government aided and residential schools, and other consequential reliefs including the maintenance of toilets and spread of awareness programmes.
Read More
20 MA No.709/2022 04-05-2022 Indira Jai Singh Vs Supreme Court Of India Through It’s Secretary General Ranjan Gogoi,j.
Instructions for designation of Advocates as Senior Advocates - We find that the allocation of 15 points for publication is high, and thus we deem it fit to reduce the available points under this category to 5 points. Most practicing advocates find very little time to write academic articles. In any case, academic publications require a different aptitude. However, given that Senior Advocates are expected to make nuanced and sophisticated submissions, academic knowledge of the law is an important prerequisite. Thus, we would not like to do away with this criteria, but expand what should fall under this criteria, while reducing the points under this category.
Read More
21 Writ Petition (Civil) No.1082/2020 26-02-2026 Suhas Chakma Vs Union Of India & Ors. Justice Mehta
Sub:Over Crowing of prisoners – Open Correctional Institutions OCI)-establishment of OCIs – Directions to State Governments and union territories to create open and/or semi-open barracks within existing closed prisons, wherever feasible, so as to provide access of reformative correctional facilities to eligible prisoners; submission of status report to monitoring Committee as constituted under Direction F; and direction to High Courts to register a suo motu writ petition, as a continuing mandamus, for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the present judgment within their respective jurisdictions, particularly with respect to the establishment, functioning and expansion of OCIs. The High Courts, through their respective Registrar General, shall compile and forward consolidated report to this Court once every year, summarising the compliance status of States and Union Territories, progress achieved, best practices identified, and persistent gaps requiring policy or executive intervention. The first such consolidated annual report shall be placed on record before this Court on or before 31st March, 2027.
Read More
22 Criminal Appeal No.1672/2019 15-07-2025 Kattavellai @ Devakar Vs State Of Tamil Nadu Justice Sanjay Karol
Guidelines for collection, preservation, transportation, and maintenance of register of Chain of Custody of DNA Evidence in Criminal Investigations.
Read More
23 Criminal Appeal No.1319/2013 17-04-2025 Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence Vs Raj Kumar Arora & Ors. Justice J.b. Pardiwala
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) – Scope, Interpretation, and Retrospective Application of Judicial Decisions - The interpretation of Section 8 of the NDPS Act, as clarified in Sanjeev V. Deshpande v. State, is to be applied retrospectively. The Court reaffirmed the general rule that judicial decisions operate retrospectively unless expressly limited. The absence of any invocation of the doctrine of prospective overruling in Sanjeev V. Deshpande indicates legislative intent to apply the interpretation to both past and pending cases. Consequently, all pending cases, including those instituted prior to the said decision, shall be governed by this interpretation. Retrospective application of the ruling does not violate Article 20(1) of the Constitution, as it does not create a new offence but merely clarifies the existing legal position. Overruling a prior judgment does not amount to enacting an ex post facto law, particularly where the interpretation is reasonable and foreseeable particularly where the interpretation is reasonable and foreseeable.
Read More
24 Criminal Appeal No.1755/2010 25-09-2025 Sanjabij Tari Vs Kishore S. Borcar & Anr. Justice Manmohan
Guidelines for compounding of Cheque bounce cases
Read More