Civil Appeal No. 32601/2018
VINEETA SHARMA VS RAKESH SHARMA & ORS.
Having regard to the plain language and future perfect tense "shall have the same rights," the only conclusion is that the daughters who are included in the coparcenary will have the same rights after coming into force of the Amendment Act. The future perfect tense indicates that an action will have been completed (finished or perfected) at some point in the future. This tense is formed with "will" plus "have" plus the past participle of the verb. If the Parliament had intended to mean as conferring the same rights in the coparcenary, anterior to the amendment, the language would have been different. The future perfect tense indicates that action will have to be completed at some point in time in the future. The tense is formed with “will” plus "have" plus the past participle of the verb. If the Parliament intended to mean conferring the same rights in the coparcenary, anterior to the amendment, the language would have been different. If the daughter is now made a coparcener, she would now have the same rights as she is a son.
View Full Judgment
August 30 1995
Civil Appeal /2750/1977
Hon'ble Justice MADAN MOHAN PUNCHHI , FAIZAN UDDIN
ABUBAKAR ABDUL INAMDAR (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS Vs. HARUN ABDUL INAMDAR AND ORS.
August 30 1995
Civil Appeal /2750/1977
Honourable Judge MADAN MOHAN PUNCHHI , FAIZAN UDDIN
ABUBAKAR ABDUL INAMDAR (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS Vs. HARUN ABDUL INAMDAR AND ORS.
April 16 2019
WP/34160/2018
Hon'ble Justice C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Ravi Aided Upper Primary School Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh
April 16 2019
WP/34160/2018
Honourable Judge C . PRAVEEN KUMAR,
M . SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Ravi Aided Upper Primary School Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh
The First Chief Justice of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati elevated to the Supreme Court of India
Born on August 29, 1964 at Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). Took B.Sc. and LL.B Degrees from Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). Enrolled as an Advocate on September 4, 1987. Practiced law in District Court at Raigarh, High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur and High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur and dealt with Civil, Criminal and Writ branches of law. Was designated as Senior Advocate by High Court of Chhattisgarh in January, 2005. Had been Chairman of Chhattisgarh State Bar Council. Was appointed/co-opted Member of the Rule Making Committee of High Court of Chhattisgarh. Had been Chancellor’s Nominee in the Executive Council of Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur. Was associated with Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) as its Ex-Officio Member in the Executive Council. Served as Additional Advocate General for the State of Chhattisgarh from June 26, 2004 to August 31, 2007 and thereafter as Advocate General for the State from September 1, 2007 till elevation. Elevated as a Judge of High Court of Chhattisgarh on December 10, 2009. Was Acting Chief Justice of High Court of Chhattisgarh from 01.6.2021 to 11.10.2021. Appointed as Chief Justice of High Court of Andhra Pradesh and assumed on 13.10.2021.
Elevated as Judge of the Supreme Court of India on May 19, 2023