W.P.(Crl.) No. 113/2016
KAUSHAL KISHOR VS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH GOVT. OF U.P. HOME SECRETARY
The Supreme Court found that the grounds enumerated in Article 19(2) for restricting the right to free speech were exhaustive, and that free speech cannot be restricted for reasons not found in Article 19(2). The Court held that Articles 19 and 21 could be enforced against non-State actors (e.g., other citizens or private companies). It also found that the State has an affirmative duty to protect a person’s rights under Article 21, even against non-State actors.The Court held that a statement made by a Minister about State affairs, could not be attributed to the Government. It also held that a mere statement by a Minister which undermined the fundamental rights of a person or citizen would not be actionable unless it led to an act or omission of public officers that caused harm or loss to the person or citizen. The judgment of the Court was authored by Justice Ramasubramanian. Justice Nagarathna wrote a separate opinion which dissented on certain issues.The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court directed that the petition from Uttar Pradesh and the appeal from Kerala be listed before regular benches of the Court to be decided in accordance with the principles laid down by the Constitution Bench.
View Full Judgment
September 11 1995
Writ Petition (C) No. /21/1994
Hon'ble Justice K. RAMASWAMY , B.L. HANSARIA
KARNATAKA STATE GOVERNMENT FIRST GRADE B C COLLEGES PART-TIME LECTURERS ASSOCIATION (REGD ). AND ANR. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
September 11 1995
Writ Petition (C) No. /21/1994
Honourable Judge K. RAMASWAMY , B.L. HANSARIA
KARNATAKA STATE GOVERNMENT FIRST GRADE B C COLLEGES PART-TIME LECTURERS ASSOCIATION (REGD ). AND ANR. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
March 24 2022
WP/20458/2019
Hon'ble Justice C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,
RAVI NATH TILHARI
Badugu Panduranga Rao, Vs. The Legal Services Authority,
March 24 2022
WP/20458/2019
Honourable Judge C . PRAVEEN KUMAR,
RAVI NATH TILHARI
Badugu Panduranga Rao, Vs. The Legal Services Authority,
The First Chief Justice of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati elevated to the Supreme Court of India
Born on August 29, 1964 at Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). Took B.Sc. and LL.B Degrees from Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). Enrolled as an Advocate on September 4, 1987. Practiced law in District Court at Raigarh, High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur and High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur and dealt with Civil, Criminal and Writ branches of law. Was designated as Senior Advocate by High Court of Chhattisgarh in January, 2005. Had been Chairman of Chhattisgarh State Bar Council. Was appointed/co-opted Member of the Rule Making Committee of High Court of Chhattisgarh. Had been Chancellor’s Nominee in the Executive Council of Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur. Was associated with Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) as its Ex-Officio Member in the Executive Council. Served as Additional Advocate General for the State of Chhattisgarh from June 26, 2004 to August 31, 2007 and thereafter as Advocate General for the State from September 1, 2007 till elevation. Elevated as a Judge of High Court of Chhattisgarh on December 10, 2009. Was Acting Chief Justice of High Court of Chhattisgarh from 01.6.2021 to 11.10.2021. Appointed as Chief Justice of High Court of Andhra Pradesh and assumed on 13.10.2021.
Elevated as Judge of the Supreme Court of India on May 19, 2023