High Court Logo
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

Smt. Justice Lisa Gill
Hon'ble The Chief Justice

"Learn to live in this world with self-respect". For Original Handwritten Constitution Click Here

HC Background2

Notifications

High Court Calendar

HC Background3

Associated Links

Landmark Judgments

Landmark Judgments

HC Background4

W.P.(C) No. 1099/2019

IN RE ARTICLE 370 OF THE CONSTITUTION VS

 The Supreme Court rejected the petitions and upheld the abolition of Article 370 and the reorganisation of the State of J&K into two Union Territories. The Judgment of the Court was authored by Chief Justice Chandrachud. Justice Sanjay K. Kaul and Justice Sanjiv Khanna wrote separate concurring opinions. The Supreme Court found that Article 370 was a “temporary” provision enacted until the special circumstances facing J&K were resolved. The Court held the President could not use a Constitutional Order to indirectly amend the Constitution to make the removal of Article 370 conditional on the recommendation of the State Legislature instead of the J&K Constituent Assembly. But it also found that the “recommendation” of the J&K Constituent Assembly under Article 370(3) would never have been binding on the President of India, who always had the power to remove Article 370. After the dissolution of the J&K Constituent Assembly, the President could abolish Article 370 whenever the President thought appropriate. The Court also held that the passage of the J&K Reorganisation Act did not violate the procedure for the reorganisation of States in Article 3. The Government of India stated that the Union Territory of J&K would be made a State again, and thus the Court did not decide the legality of converting the State of J&K into two Union Territories. The Court directed that elections to the Legislative Assembly for the Union Territory of J&K be held by 30 September 2024.

View Full Judgment
eAPHCR

eAPHCR

HC Background5

September 20 1961

Civil Appeal/401/1961

Hon'ble Justice B.P. SINHA C.J, P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR AND RAGHUBAR DAYAL

MOOL CHAND SHARMA Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH


September 20 1961

Civil Appeal/401/1961

Honourable Judge B.P. SINHA C.J, P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR AND RAGHUBAR DAYAL

MOOL CHAND SHARMA Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH


HC Background6

October 20 2021

SA/416/2014

Hon'ble Justice M.VENKATA RAMANA

L.Nageswara Rao Vs. A.Srinivasa Rao


October 20 2021

SA/416/2014

Honourable Judge M . VENKATA RAMANA

L.Nageswara Rao Vs. A.Srinivasa Rao


HC Image

Did you know?

Hon'ble Smt. Justice K. Amareswari

Hon'ble Smt. Justice K. Amareswari

The First woman judge of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh

Amareswari was born in Appikatla Village in Guntur District. She graduated with a master's degree in Politics and History from Andhra University College of Law in the year 1949. She completed her bachelor's in law from the same university. She became the first lady judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. She was a member of the Bar Council from 1960 to 1961 and was appointed Judge directly from the Bar. She was the Vice-President of the Indian Federation of Women Lawyers.[2] She also worked as the Vice-President of the Andhra Pradesh High Court Advocates Association during the period 1975-1976. In the year 1978 on 29 April she was appointed permanent Judge for Andhra Pradesh High Court. She died on 25 July 2009, in New Delhi where she had been practising as a senior advocate at the Supreme Court. She is survived by a son and daughter.